The imitation game

The imitation game

I blame Doctor Who. It’s my earliest memory of watching television.

Of the 15 actors who have portrayed the Doctor on TV, Patrick Troughton made the deepest impression. He was the second Doctor (after William Hartnell) and played him as an eccentric cosmic hobo who wore tartan trousers and blew a recorder. The late chess master Michael Basman would also have been convincing in the role.

What has Doctor Who to do with chess? One of the things that first drew me to the game was its time-travelling quality. It was a direct link to the past; to be sat pondering the very same chess position that had puzzled the Great Masters hundreds of years ago – wow! Chess was a kind of TARDIS. I could be a Time Lord too!

Apart from sparking an interest in the game’s history, this sense of wonder may explain why so much of my opening repertoire is still rooted in the early twentieth century.

All this crossed my mind as I was playing Will Burt last week. We reached this position after eight moves:

Jon Manley v Will Burt

Oxford City 1 v Cowley 1, Oxford League Division 1

The opening was the venerable Four Knights’ Game. It was all the rage in the 1900s; chess legends Lasker, Capablanca, Alekhine, Marshall and Tarrasch all reached this position.

White’s challenge is to break the symmetry and get a small advantage. What’s to stop Black simply copying White’s moves and making an early draw?

I remembered that this position is discussed in How to Play the Chess Openings by the fabulously named Eugene Znosko-Borovsky. This book was essential reading for chess players in the 1940s and Dad had given me his copy when I was a schoolboy. I could picture its green mildewed cover but couldn’t for the life of me recall any of its advice about the position. Damn!

This is what it has to say:

All well and good, but what’s White’s best try here?

He has four plausible ‘slightly aggressive’ moves – two captures, a capture with check and a fork:

9 Nxb4, 9 Bxf6, 9 Nxf6+ and 9 c3

After a while I chose the quiet 9 Bc4, challenging Will to be the first to deviate, but he declined with

9…Bc5

Time for White to be more aggressive.

  10 c3

Now, following Znosko’s advice, Black must break the symmetry because 10…c6? would lose a piece to 11 Nxf6+ gxf6 12 cxd4.

10…Nxf3+ 11 gxf3 Bh3 12 Re1 c6 13 Nxf6+ gxf6

Now White can invite a return to symmetry with 14 Bh6, which was the choice of the famous attacking master Rudolf Spielmann. In that game his opponent gave up the exchange by 14…Kh8 15 Bxf8 Qxf8 with an eventual draw (Spielmann-Teichmann, San Sebastian 1912).

Will Burt is a dangerous player who will sacrifice the exchange in the blink of an eye. So rather than wave a red flag with 14 Bh6 I played

14 Bh4

The computer likes this move as it keeps an eye on Black’s main weakness, his f6 pawn.

14…d5 15 Bb3 d4?

A mistake because it loses time and exposes Black’s f7 pawn. His best plan is …Kh8 and …Rg8 immediately.

16 Kh1 Be6?? 17 Qd2

Suddenly Black is defenceless against White’s invasion on the g-file.

17…Kh8 18 Qh6 Be7 19 Rg1 Rg8 20 Rxg8+ Qxg8 21 Rg1  1-0

This still leaves the question: what’s White’s best move in this position?

All Znosko says in his book is that Black should avoid it altogether and deviate two moves earlier.

What about the Greats? Capablanca tried 9 Nxb4, and Alekhine 9 Kh1 (a bit tame for him). Meanwhile Tarrasch and Marshall were happy defending the black side against weaker opponents. Unable to take a spin in the TARDIS to seek their opinion. I asked Stockfish instead. Strangely the engine recommends 9 c3 and continuing the imitation game:

9 c3 c6 10 Nxf6+ gxf6 11 Bh6 Nxf3+ 12 gxf3 Bh3 13 Re1 Re8 14 f4 f5 15 Kh1 Kh8 16 Rg1 Rg8 17 Bc4

Now 17…Bc5 fails to 18 Qh5! Bg4 19 Rxg4 fxg4 20 Bxf7, so Black has to try the queen manoeuvre himself.

17… Qh4 18 Bg5 Rxg5 19 fxg5 Bc5 20 d4! with a clear advantage to White.

All hail Stockfish, our sonic screwdriver!

Our chess queen

To celebrate International Women’s Day, we remember one of our strongest women members.

Amabel Sollas, née Jeffreys (1855?-1928) was president of our chess club and British Ladies’ Chess Champion in 1913.

Sadly typical of the time, her obituary says more about her husbands’ achievements than her own.

Times, 1 May 1928

The Times published more information in a later edition.

Times, 9 May 1928

British Chess Magazine published her self-deprecating account of how she took up chess:

We supplement our brief notice last month of the late Mrs Sollas with some details which she herself supplied two years ago:

She was [she wrote] the youngest daughter of John Gwynn Jeffreys, of Ware Priory, Herts, and learnt the moves of chess on her eighth birthday. Chess was only a childish amusement until quite late in life when, as Mrs Moseley (widow of H.N. Moseley, Linacre Professor of Zoology at Oxford, famous for his original researches and work on the “Challenger” Expedition in 1876) she joined the Oxford City Club in 1906. Finding herself badly beaten by a friend, Mrs Conybeare, she concluded it would be amusing to learn an opening or two. … She was not at all a good player, although by luck she gained the Women’s Championship in 1913. After that came the War, and she went to France to help in Canteens and the French Red Cross, and lost what little skill was ever hers at chess. She gained the Oxford C.C.C. championship in 1924 because there were no good players, and among the blind the one-eyed is king! … She played in the Oxfordshire county team in 1923-26, with varying success. If given a board low down, she occasionally manages to win.

Mrs Sollas’s estimate of her skill, we many remark, was unduly modest; and her love of the game was sincere and pleasing to witness.

British Chess Magazine (May 1928), p.278