Gambit style

Gambit style

Jan Murawski and Shambavi Hariharan played great games in our 6-0 defeat of Didcot 1 last week. Shambavi won a pawn in her favourite Caro-Kann and finished with a mating attack. Jan calmly cruised the complications of a dangerous gambit to expose his opponent’s king.

Jan Murawski – Nick Gough

Oxford City v Didcot 1, 20.03.2024

Albin Counter Gambit

1 d4 d5 2 c4 e5

Rarely seen in master chess these days, the gambit has a few strong grandmaster advocates including Alexander Morozevich.

3 dxe5 d4 4 Nf3 Nc6 5 g3 Be6 6 Nbd2 Qd7 7 a3 Nge7 8 Nb3

White usually plays 8 Bg2 here. One of the early games in this line went: 8…Ng6 9 Qa4 Be7 10 Nb3 0–0–0 11 Bg5 Kb8 12 Bxe7 Qxe7 13 0–0 Bd7 14 Na5 Nxa5 15 Qxa5 Bc6 16 Rfe1 d3 17 Qd2 Qc5 18 exd3 Bxf3 19 Bxf3 Nxe5 20 Re3 Rhe8 21 Rae1 Qd4 22 Bg2 f6 23 Re4 Qb6 24 d4 Rf8 25 Qc3 Nc6 26 d5 Ne5 27 c5 Qa6 28 Bf1 b5 29 cxb6 Qb7 30 bxc7+ Qxc7 31 Rb4+1–0 (Marshall-Janowski, Havana 1913).

8…Ng6 9 Nbxd4

9…Bxc4?!

9…0–0–0 is the best move and can lead to interesting complications: 10 Be3 Ngxe5 11 Nxe5 Nxe5 12 Bg2 Bxc4 13 Qc2 Bc5 14 Nf5 Bxe2 15 Bxc5 Ba6 16 Nd6+ Kb8 17 0–0–0 cxd6 18 Bxd6+ Qxd6 19 Rxd6 Rxd6= 20 Qa4 Rhd8 21 Kb1 Nc4 22 Rc1 Rd4 23 Ka1 f6 24 Qc2 Rd2 25 Qf5 Ne5 26 Bh3 b6 27 Qxh7 Bc4 28 b3 Bxb3 29 Qxg7 Nc4 30 Rxc4 Bxc4 31 Bg4 Re8 0–1 (Levitt-Speelman, British Championship, 1982).

10 Nxc6 Qxc6 11 Bg2 Qa6

This is Nick’s Idea – he’s lost a pawn but Jan will have trouble castling since it allows …Bxe2.
Note that 11…Nxe5?? would lose to 12 Nxe5 Qxg2 13 Qd7 mate. The computer prefers  11…Rd8 12 Qc2 Nxe5 13 Bf4 Be6 14 Qxc6+ Nxc6 15 Bxc7 Rd7 16 Bf4 Be7 17 0–0 Bf6 with some compensation for the pawn.

12 b3 Bb5

13 e6!?

Jan is happy to return his extra pawn to saddle Black with a weak pawn on e6 and open the a1-h8 diagonal for his bishop. A good alternative was 13 Bb2 Be7 14 Qc2 0–0 15 Nd4.

13…f6?

After the game Nick admitted this was a mistake because it allows Jan to castle quickly. 13…fxe6 14 Bb2 Bd6 15 Bxg7 Rg8 16 Bb2 0–0–0 gives Black play for the pawn.

14 0–0 Rd8

Not 14…Bxe2?? 15 Qd7 mate.

15 Qc2 Bd6 16 Nd4 0–0 17 Nxb5 Qxb5 18 a4 Qe5 19 Bb2 Qxe6 20 Bxb7

Jan has regained his pawn and kept the advantage of the two bishops. He is clearly better.

20…Rb8 21 Qe4

Now 21…Qxe4 22 Bxe4 Rxb3 loses to 23 Bd5+.

21…Qh3 22 Bd5+ Kh8 23 Qg2 Qh5 24 e3 Ne5 25 Bd4 a6 26 Rac1 Rfd8

27 Bxe5

Jan makes an excellent practical decision to remove Black’s knight, seeing that his domination of the white squares will keep Nick on the defensive. Also strong was 27 f4 Ng6 28 Ba7 Rb4 29 Bf7 Qg4 30 Rfd1 Ne7.

27…Qxe5 28 Rc4 a5

28…Rxb3 29 Re4 Qxd5 30 Re8+ wins.

29 Re4 Qc3 30 Rh4 h6 31 Qh3

When each player controls squares of opposite colour, the one holding the initiative often has a decisive advantage, especially here where the heavy pieces add force to White’s attack. Jan threatens to win immediately with 32 Rxh6+.

31…Bf8

31…Qc2 is a more active way to secure the kingside. Black can only hope to relieve the pressure by exchanging pieces or sacrificing the exchange on b3, but he is never given the chance..

32 Bc4 Rd6 33 Qg4

33…Rbd8?

The ugly 33…g5 was the only way to hang on.

34 Rxh6+

With mate next move.

1–0

Shambavi carefully guided her passed a-pawn up the board and then unsettled her opponent by switching to full attack mode.

Reed – Hariharan

White’s king looks a little vulnerable whereas Black’s is sitting pretty behind his brick of pawns. Shambavi takes direct action.

36…Qb1! 37 Qe8+ Kh7 38 Qxa4

38…Rh1! 39 f4??

39.Qc4 seems to be best but Black is winning after 39…Qg1+ 40.Kf3 Rxh3+41,Ke2 Qg2 and Qf3+.

39…Qf1+ 40 Kg3 Rxh3 mate

A brutal finish to a smooth positional game.

Shambavi and Jan with their county trophies
The imitation game

The imitation game

I blame Doctor Who. It’s my earliest memory of watching television.

Of the 15 actors who have portrayed the Doctor on TV, Patrick Troughton made the deepest impression. He was the second Doctor (after William Hartnell) and played him as an eccentric cosmic hobo who wore tartan trousers and blew a recorder. The late chess master Michael Basman would also have been convincing in the role.

What has Doctor Who to do with chess? One of the things that first drew me to the game was its time-travelling quality. It was a direct link to the past; to be sat pondering the very same chess position that had puzzled the Great Masters hundreds of years ago – wow! Chess was a kind of TARDIS. I could be a Time Lord too!

Apart from sparking an interest in the game’s history, this sense of wonder may explain why so much of my opening repertoire is still rooted in the early twentieth century.

All this crossed my mind as I was playing Will Burt last week. We reached this position after eight moves:

Jon Manley v Will Burt

Oxford City 1 v Cowley 1, Oxford League Division 1

The opening was the venerable Four Knights’ Game. It was all the rage in the 1900s; chess legends Lasker, Capablanca, Alekhine, Marshall and Tarrasch all reached this position.

White’s challenge is to break the symmetry and get a small advantage. What’s to stop Black simply copying White’s moves and making an early draw?

I remembered that this position is discussed in How to Play the Chess Openings by the fabulously named Eugene Znosko-Borovsky. This book was essential reading for chess players in the 1940s and Dad had given me his copy when I was a schoolboy. I could picture its green mildewed cover but couldn’t for the life of me recall any of its advice about the position. Damn!

This is what it has to say:

All well and good, but what’s White’s best try here?

He has four plausible ‘slightly aggressive’ moves – two captures, a capture with check and a fork:

9 Nxb4, 9 Bxf6, 9 Nxf6+ and 9 c3

After a while I chose the quiet 9 Bc4, challenging Will to be the first to deviate, but he declined with

9…Bc5

Time for White to be more aggressive.

  10 c3

Now, following Znosko’s advice, Black must break the symmetry because 10…c6? would lose a piece to 11 Nxf6+ gxf6 12 cxd4.

10…Nxf3+ 11 gxf3 Bh3 12 Re1 c6 13 Nxf6+ gxf6

Now White can invite a return to symmetry with 14 Bh6, which was the choice of the famous attacking master Rudolf Spielmann. In that game his opponent gave up the exchange by 14…Kh8 15 Bxf8 Qxf8 with an eventual draw (Spielmann-Teichmann, San Sebastian 1912).

Will Burt is a dangerous player who will sacrifice the exchange in the blink of an eye. So rather than wave a red flag with 14 Bh6 I played

14 Bh4

The computer likes this move as it keeps an eye on Black’s main weakness, his f6 pawn.

14…d5 15 Bb3 d4?

A mistake because it loses time and exposes Black’s f7 pawn. His best plan is …Kh8 and …Rg8 immediately.

16 Kh1 Be6?? 17 Qd2

Suddenly Black is defenceless against White’s invasion on the g-file.

17…Kh8 18 Qh6 Be7 19 Rg1 Rg8 20 Rxg8+ Qxg8 21 Rg1  1-0

This still leaves the question: what’s White’s best move in this position?

All Znosko says in his book is that Black should avoid it altogether and deviate two moves earlier.

What about the Greats? Capablanca tried 9 Nxb4, and Alekhine 9 Kh1 (a bit tame for him). Meanwhile Tarrasch and Marshall were happy defending the black side against weaker opponents. Unable to take a spin in the TARDIS to seek their opinion. I asked Stockfish instead. Strangely the engine recommends 9 c3 and continuing the imitation game:

9 c3 c6 10 Nxf6+ gxf6 11 Bh6 Nxf3+ 12 gxf3 Bh3 13 Re1 Re8 14 f4 f5 15 Kh1 Kh8 16 Rg1 Rg8 17 Bc4

Now 17…Bc5 fails to 18 Qh5! Bg4 19 Rxg4 fxg4 20 Bxf7, so Black has to try the queen manoeuvre himself.

17… Qh4 18 Bg5 Rxg5 19 fxg5 Bc5 20 d4! with a clear advantage to White.

All hail Stockfish, our sonic screwdriver!

Shambavi and Jan are champions!

Congratulations to our new Oxfordshire county champions, Shambavi Hariharan and Jan Murawski.

Shambavi took the Girls’ Under-18 title on tiebreak from the talented Ukrainian Taisiia Kovalova.

Jan lifted the Boys’ Under-13 trophy ahead of Magdalen College School’s Yue Yue Sui (2nd) and Albert Hornsby (3rd).

Jan and Shambavi compete regularly for Oxford City in the First Division of the Oxford League and are gaining valuable experience playing weekend congresses.

Jan made his debut for Oxford in Division One of the prestigious Four Nations Chess League last weekend and a few weeks ago defeated his first Grandmaster, Keith Arkell.

Keith Arkell v Jan Murawski

East Midlands Chess Congress 2024

Expect to hear a lot more about Shambavi and Jan in the coming years!

Our chess queen

To celebrate International Women’s Day, we remember one of our strongest women members.

Amabel Sollas, née Jeffreys (1855?-1928) was president of our chess club and British Ladies’ Chess Champion in 1913.

Sadly typical of the time, her obituary says more about her husbands’ achievements than her own.

Times, 1 May 1928

The Times published more information in a later edition.

Times, 9 May 1928

British Chess Magazine published her self-deprecating account of how she took up chess:

We supplement our brief notice last month of the late Mrs Sollas with some details which she herself supplied two years ago:

She was [she wrote] the youngest daughter of John Gwynn Jeffreys, of Ware Priory, Herts, and learnt the moves of chess on her eighth birthday. Chess was only a childish amusement until quite late in life when, as Mrs Moseley (widow of H.N. Moseley, Linacre Professor of Zoology at Oxford, famous for his original researches and work on the “Challenger” Expedition in 1876) she joined the Oxford City Club in 1906. Finding herself badly beaten by a friend, Mrs Conybeare, she concluded it would be amusing to learn an opening or two. … She was not at all a good player, although by luck she gained the Women’s Championship in 1913. After that came the War, and she went to France to help in Canteens and the French Red Cross, and lost what little skill was ever hers at chess. She gained the Oxford C.C.C. championship in 1924 because there were no good players, and among the blind the one-eyed is king! … She played in the Oxfordshire county team in 1923-26, with varying success. If given a board low down, she occasionally manages to win.

Mrs Sollas’s estimate of her skill, we many remark, was unduly modest; and her love of the game was sincere and pleasing to witness.

British Chess Magazine (May 1928), p.278